Conversation

This is definitely going to have more mastodon vibes than cohost vibes but maybe we will do better this time

1
0
1

@shel Based on formatting, or what? I ask because I'm pretty sure we can do whatever we want with formatting without too much difficulty.

1
0
0

@nora because at least when using the front ends we hijacked from mastodon it's all designed to look like twitter its all short and small and everything updates in realtime and is all fast and zippy feeling. It doesn't have static blog vibes. It is designed to be microblogging

2
0
0

@shel Understood! I think that's probably the most solvable of all format issues tbh; frontends are totally malleable, and we already have people like easrng (dunno her @ here) building stuff that looks more like Cohost or Tumblr or what have you

I think part of the thing is that there's just more freedom than Cohost; Cohost bounced people who didn't like its interface, whereas here people are more likely to bend their software to their needs. (This is not necessarily a good thing if you want to enforce some level of uniformity of experience!)

2
0
0

@shel @nora i think pillbug will help, whenever that gets to a usable stage. (or if anyone else builds a similar thing)

1
1
0

@nora but I don't want to interact with people who are using Twitter when I'm trying to use livejournal. They're going to behave in a way encouraged by Twitter when I want livejournal interactions.

I don't like the freedom of the fediverse it was bad

1
0
0

@shel Yeah. And one advantage of having a decision-making body that (at last in theory) controls the allowlist is that we can enforce that people use - or, at least, provide - certain interfaces.

0
0
0