Conversation

do not want this to be a place where anyone gets yelled at for not putting “my tummy horts” under a ph- cw though for real

3
0
2

@bobskunk if that kind of junk were to happen (and i have faith that it won’t!) i would absolutely kickflip the fuck outta here - but i doubt i will have to cuz it seems like that opinion is the general agreed-upon consensus (as it should be)

0
0
2

@viv Hm, rats, can’t click that since it opens a new tab displaying 404 since i’m not auth’d there (and won’t open inline on this akkoma instance, it’s treated as a new page and not a post to zip to)

But if it’s about the general coc draft vibes on what should/shall be cw’d then yeah, I’ve got faith that things will turn out okay and we’re not just going to import established baggage and practice wholesale.

2
0
0

@bobskunk @viv you can always try pasting the post link into the search bar fyi

2
0
0

@adam @bobskunk ^ yeah, that should work to let you view it, i don't think it's actually a private post

1
0
0

@adam @viv wish that was handled as a link to a post (since it can be parsed as such by search!)

I know instance sites and auth and copying and pasting everything was always the clunk and compromise of this software, but dang

anyway thank you, that did help and it’s good to get a refresher

2
0
0

@bobskunk the gist is basically, we should be explicit about the culture we want in the coc or some other league-wide document, if it's left undefined then i think things are more likely to drift in other directions

1
0
1

@bobskunk @viv yeaaa, I know, some types of instances handle that better than others (for example, firefish worked fine iirc)

0
0
0

@bobskunk @adam i'm just going to make a note for myself for #pillbug here that we need a way to easily follow links to other posts inside of the app because otherwise there's a lot of 404s with gotosocial's default mode of hiding unlisted posts from unauthenticated access.

1
0
1

@viv @bobskunk yeah, encountered that a bunch when trying to share post links with some friends

0
0
0

@bobskunk specifically that we don't say anything about what not to cw (sent the last post before i was truly 'done')

1
0
0

@viv That’s a good point. Some people are really great at finding vacuums in organizations and policies to aggressively set up their own and this could represent one.

A few examples of common CWs that are mandated elsewhere but not mandated (or even discouraged) here, might be a real good idea.

That + “don’t get on people’s cases for not following your personal or imported/customary CW policy when they comply with WL CW policy” explicitly declared would be pretty groovy to me

0
0
2