Posts
251
Following
Hidden
Followers
Hidden
have you tried turning it off and on again?
operator of https://league.adamski2003.lol
steward of the https://websiteleague.org

@KaydeArcane if you liked tunic, chances are you’ll also like outer wilds, that one’s also a masterpiece

1
0
2

@rawks (did I mention that I love akkoma?)

0
0
2

@mae ooooor do an @everyone, or a post here, the latter definitely worked when we found out about the relays

1
0
1

@mae nvm, they don’t count as replies, akkoma just helpfully displays the quoted thread when you expand it

1
0
1

@mae …oh, I think it counted as a reply bc of the mention? idk

1
0
0

@mae quotes do not count as replies, no, they’re their own thing that lives in a new post (and they do have fallbacks for instances that don’t support them)

0
0
4

@nora @tenna oh well, time to parse some html then

0
0
1

@tenna I already checked, no support in cohost.py or any of the other libs (they were mostly focused on posting, not getting posts), and I do know that they didn’t have an official API, I’m just poking at pages with devtools open and seeing what trpc methods I can get out of that

0
0
2

yknow what, I’m also gonna ask here in case someone knows: anyone got any idea if cohost has an api method to get a tag timeline? I’m back on my archival bs and while I will pull in cheerio and parse the SSR pages if needed, I’d prefer to not do that

1
0
2
repeated

my guy is so sparkly :]
#art

1
8
5

@tenna who cares if it’s potentially harder to upstream, it’s for the Greater Good

1
0
1
repeated

birze (now @alyaza @ akkoma.mellivora.social)

reading about animal (and general non-human) personhood

this seems like sort of an unbridgeable problem with law eventually because, strictly speaking, it is accurate to say many animals have a capacity equal to how we define personhood--but:

  1. the complexity of humanity vs all other things still seems to be a clear divide between us and everything else, and that has logical implications;
  2. irrespective of the first thing we really don't have a way of accommodating non-human animals or things in the legal system1 besides "'being represented by a human" since none of these things are capable of comprehending human law and we have no way of communicating it to them

1 which is what would make personhood meaningful; recognizing personhood without the resultant rights of personhood is obviously nonsensical, and we adjudicate those through law

0
1
4
Show older